Off Hand or Off Head

Knowing what you want accomplished may seem clear in your head, but if you try to explain it to someone else and are met with a blank expression, you know there is a problem. If this has been your experience, then you may want to focus on honing your communication skills. Being able to clearly and succinctly describe what you want done is extremely important. If you can’t relate your vision to your team, you won’t all be working towards the same goal.

Training new members and creating a productive work environment all depend on healthy lines of communication. Whether that stems from an open door policy to your office, or making it a point to talk to your staff on a daily basis, making yourself available to discuss interoffice issues is vital. Your team will learn to trust and depend on you, and will be less hesitant to work harder.

Government as Enabler

One of the government’s roles is to ensure that the right systems, the right processes and the people champion a cause. Especially in radical situation, radical solution is required.

It is still fresh in our minds what Dora did with NAFDAC, EL-Rufai did with FCT, Ribadu did with EFCC, Soludo did with CBN. We need Champions. I hope people like Fashola and Kachikwu survives this tenure and is allowed to shine and not get overwhelmed by the level of decay and the amount of frustration even his colleagues and those they report to will be ready to supply.

Strengths

Successful leaders utilize their strengths to influence others, and they make an effort to minimize weaknesses that interfere with their ability to lead. Effective leaders can turn weaknesses into positive characteristics through diligent efforts. At the same time, they consistently work to boost their strengths while seeking assistance to overcome weak traits.

Sometimes, I work with business professionals who have adopted a strategy of doubling down on their strengths and ignoring their weaknesses. They generally take this approach as they face difficulties in the workplace. Some of these leaders and managers are simply doing more of what has always worked for them in the past.

It is a management strategy that sounds good, but in reality it does not fit the complex, dynamic nature of our times. Further, when it is overused it becomes an excuse for bad management behavior and inflexibility. Finally, it assumes that we will only have limited success in addressing our weaknesses so it is better to focus on what comes to us naturally.

Taken to an extreme (as I often see people do), strengths-only thinking is a cynical view on our ability to evolve and grow as business managers. Having made my own managerial evolution, I know there is value in investing time and effort on our own self-improvement. I did grow as a manager but it was not by doubling down on my strengths.  I had to acknowledge and address my weaknesses to improve my managerial effectiveness. We make changes all the time including some very difficult ones. We just need to believe it is in our best interests to make the changes. Effective managers are natural problem solvers and change agents, particularly when they are committed to making needed change.

Business trends also show the error of the strengths-only school of management. Globally, managers and leaders have noted how difficult it is to manage organizations in this new decade.  These difficulties are creating a dynamic environment where disruptive change is the norm. Businesses need adaptable managers who can embrace ambiguity as they respond to changing business needs.  Inflexible managers who refuse to address their weaknesses will find that they have become an organizational liability as their weaknesses now collide with new business realities.

So, what’s the right approach?  Focus on your strengths and minimize your weaknesses (instead of ignoring them). Acknowledge your weaknesses but do not obsess over them. Improve your skills where you can.  Since everyone has limitations, there will be some areas where you will never excel.  Delegate this work to others on your team who are more skilled than you and then leave them alone and let them handle these areas for you. Most importantly, always look for chances to improve your skills and address your weaknesses and you will remain viable.

Those who forget their weaknesses and focus only on their strengths risk becoming a manager with only a hammer in their management toolbox.  And, we know what happens when managers only have a hammer in their toolbox - every organizational problem looks like a nail to them! They’re always pounding away with the same approach.

Managers should use their strengths as much as possible particularly where their usage makes sense for the issues they are facing. They need to avoid excessive use of their strengths, however. Otherwise, they will become unbalanced managers. Managers who adopt a singular focus on their strengths and ignore their weaknesses, run the risk of becoming one-trick ponies.

Who Wants Trump?

Within and outside United States of America, the questions on lips of people are Who wants Trump? Why Trump?

Despite the relentless attacks on Trump, which started at last week’s GOP debate in Houston and carried through a raucous weekend of campaigning, his major contenders Cruz and Rubio were not able to deliver significant results. He scored well among late-deciding voters; in Virginia they favored him over Trump by about 20 points. But there were not enough of them to overcome the hold Trump has on anti-establishment Republicans who remain in control of the nominating battle.

What is remarkable is that the anti-Trump forces only recently awoke to the reality that Trump was on track to take the nomination. Instead, Trump has awakened a voting bloc that has soured on the party leadership. As he has continued to win, his support has continued to grow.